Augustine of Hippo
"To eat that meat which endures to everlasting life is to believe in Him. Why do you make ready your tooth and your belly? Only believe, and you have eaten already."
Catholics often present the Church Fathers as speaking with a unified voice in support of later Catholic doctrine. Yet the historical record is far more complex. The Church Fathers disagreed with each other on almost every topic, including the nature of the Eucharist, the role of tradition, and the meaning of Peter's primacy. This site is a collection of those dissenting voices, not necessarily to prove one side exhaustively, but rather to show the diversity of patristic thinking in a way that allows us to approach these topics with more humility.
The Church Fathers matter because they are the earliest witnesses to how the apostolic tradition was understood in the generations immediately following the apostles. When we want to know what the New Testament authors meant — how their words were heard, how their practices were received — the Fathers are irreplaceable. They are not infallible, and they frequently contradict one another. But they are the closest we can get to the apostolic mind outside of Scripture itself. Historically, Protestants have been well versed in church history and championed patristic scholarship. However, this has faded in recent generations. Hopefully, this site encourages interest in the early church and provides grounding for the beliefs of your church.
While Eucharistic theology is diverse among the Fathers, several early theologians disagreed with the logic of transubstantiation, which teaches that Christ is objectively present for anyone who partakes in the Supper. Instead, the reception of Christ is tied to faith. Receiving the bread and cup without faith does not confer grace. This is most compatible with the Reformed view of Spiritual presence, where reception is tied to the Holy Spirit.
"To eat that meat which endures to everlasting life is to believe in Him. Why do you make ready your tooth and your belly? Only believe, and you have eaten already."
"He that eats within, not without; who eats in his heart, not who presses with his teeth."
"Consequently, he that dwells not in Christ and in whom Christ dwells not, doubtless neither eats His flesh nor drinks His blood."
"For he who is not in the body of Christ is not to be considered to eat the body of Christ."
"Which seems to me to be thus: as it is not the meat but the conscience of him who eats with doubt which defiles him… there is advantage to him who uses it, when with undefiled mind and pure conscience he partakes of the bread… [the Eucharist] goes into the belly and is cast out into the draught, but in respect of the prayer which comes upon it, according to the proportion of the faith, becomes a benefit."
"The Word was made flesh and very meat, which whoso eateth shall surely live for ever; which no evil man can eat. For if it could be that he that continueth evil might eat the Word made flesh, seeing that he is the Word and bread of life, it should not have been written, 'Whosoever eateth this bread, shall live for ever.'"
The Protestant Reformers did not deny that Christ was present in the Eucharist. They merely rejected transubstantiation as the specific means by which Christ was present. Many church fathers taught that Christ was spiritually present where the Holy Spirit unites us to Christ's finite and locally present body in heaven. Some fathers may have taught a localized presence in the Eucharist, akin to a Lutheran view, using vivid language that the host truly is "Christ's body". However, some fathers explained that sacraments take the name of the thing they signify. Not in the sense that they are mere symbols, but because God truly communicates grace through them.
"That sacrament is Christ, because it is the Body of Christ — it is therefore not bodily food but spiritual."
"But this, and the blood from it, shall be given to you spiritually at My hands as meat, so as to be imparted spiritually in each one, and to become for all a preservative to resurrection of life eternal."
"This bread is the food of the soul, and not the meat of the belly."
"To eat then that meat which endures to everlasting life is to believe in Him. Why do you make ready your tooth and your belly? Only believe, and you have eaten already."
"How shall I take hold of the absent? How shall I stretch up my hand into heaven, and take hold of one who is sitting there? Stretch up your faith, and you have got hold."
"Christ on a certain occasion discoursing with the Jews said, 'Except ye eat My flesh and drink My blood, ye have no life in you.' They, not having heard His saying in a spiritual sense, were offended, and went back, supposing that He was inviting them to eat flesh."
"For when you see the Lord sacrificed, and laid upon the altar… are you not, on the contrary, straightway translated to Heaven?"
"As the bread, before it is sanctified, is called bread, but after the divine grace has sanctified it by the mediation of the priest it is no longer called bread, but dignified with the name of the body of the Lord, though the nature of bread remain in it"
"For if sacraments had not some points of real resemblance to the things of which they are the sacraments, they would not be sacraments at all. In most cases, moreover, they do in virtue of this likeness bear the names of the realities which they resemble."
The Catholic Church teaches a view of the Eucharist called transubstantiation, where the substance of the Eucharist becomes Christ's body, but the accidents of bread remain. Technically speaking, this means that the Eucharist looks, feels, and tastes like bread, but it is not bread in any sense of the word. The very nature of the bread has transformed into Christ. However, the Church Fathers were adamant that the bread remains bread in substance after consecration. This was because the Eucharist (both earthly and heavenly elements) is meant to reflect the Incarnation of Christ (who is both man and God).
"No longer common bread, but the Eucharist, consisting of two realities, earthly and heavenly."
"The bread and wine in the Sacraments remain still the same they were before."
"Yet the substance or nature of the bread and wine does not cease."
"After the consecration the mystical signs do not cast off their own proper nature; for they remain still in their former substance, form, and kind."
"There ceaseth not to be still the substance of bread, and nature of wine."
"The bread, before it be sanctified, is called bread; but when it is sanctified by the means of the priest, it is delivered from the name of bread, and is exalted to the name of the Lord's body, although the nature of bread doth still remain."
In Catholic theology, there is an emphasis on the quantification of grace, where the Eucharist offers one of several unique graces in the Christian life. This can create anxiety as Christians attempt to 'collect' each grace, as well as lead to legalism surrounding which Eucharists are to be considered valid. However, many Fathers spoke of Scripture and the ongoing act of faith as participating in Christ's body and blood as well, which is reflected in the Reformed doctrine of union with Christ. The entirety of Christ is offered through each means of grace to reassure us of our gifts already received by faith.
"We are said to drink the blood of Christ, not only by the sacramental rite, but also when we receive His word, in which is life."
"To nourish ourselves with his flesh and drink his blood — not only in the Eucharist but also in reading sacred Scripture."
"When we hear the word of God, Christ's body and blood are being poured into our ears."
"[Your] souls I would without hesitation call altars, on which Christ is daily offered."
"To eat then that meat which endures to everlasting life is to believe in Him. Why do you make ready your tooth and your belly? Only believe, and you have eaten already."
Rome believes that the Mass is a propitiatory sacrifice that re-presents Christ's sacrifice to us. Now, many Reformed theologians agree that Christ is re-presented in the Supper (in the sense that the Holy Spirit connects us to Christ's eternal sacrifice), but it does not atone for sins. Additionally, the Reformers emphasized that the church fathers often spoke of the Eucharist (or 'thanksgiving' in greek) as a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving, just as Romans 12 tells us to offer our worship as a living sacrifice.
"But every Lord's Day gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure."
"Now we make offering to Him, not as though He stood in need of it, but rendering thanks for His gift, and thus sanctifying what has been created."
In medieval Europe, superstition surrounding the Eucharist had reached a climactic point where the priest no longer offered the wine to the laity for fear that it might spill. This was one of the main concerns of the Protestant reformers, who claimed that Christ instituted the Supper in both elements, according to the scriptures and the universal testimony of the fathers. However, the Council of Trent anathematizes the position that Christ commanded both elements: "If any one saith, that, by the precept of God, or, by necessity of salvation, all and each of the faithful of Christ ought to receive both species of the most holy sacrament not consecrating; let him be anathema". Ironically, Roman apologists often point to John 6:53 that "unless you eat His flesh and drink His blood, you have no life in you" to support their view that the Eucharist is necessary for salvation, meanwhile most Catholics for 600 years never received the blood of Christ.
"Division of one and the same mystery cannot come about without a great sacrilege."
"We have ascertained that certain persons, receiving only a portion of the sacred body, abstain from the cup of the sacred blood. Such persons, without any doubt, are to be held bound by a certain superstition."
"Then after having partaken of the body of Christ, approach also to the cup of his blood: not stretching forth thine hands, but bending, and saying in the way of worship and reverence, Amen, hallow yourself by partaking also of the blood of Christ."
"That bread which you see on the altar, having been sanctified by the word of God, is the body of Christ. That chalice, or rather, what is in that chalice, having been sanctified by the word of God, is the blood of Christ."
The Church Fathers nearly unanimously argued for some form of baptismal regeneration, where baptism truly participates in salvation. However, the specific mechanism of this regeneration is not unanimous. Several church fathers emphasized that the efficacy of baptism is tied to faith and repentance. This differs from the Roman teaching of Ex Opere Operato, in which grace is objectively conferred through the valid administration of the sacrament itself.
"Not that in the water we obtain the Holy Spirit, but being cleansed in the water under the angel, we are prepared for the Holy Spirit."
"That baptismal washing is a sealing of faith, which faith is begun and is commended by the faith of repentance… We are not washed so that we may cease sinning, but because we have ceased, since in heart we have been bathed already. For the first baptism of a learner is this, a perfect fear; thenceforward, in so far as you have understanding of the Lord faith is sound, the conscience having once for all embraced repentance."
"[Baptism without faith:] for the water will receive, but the Spirit will not accept you."
"Once Simon Magus also entered into the water; he was baptized but not enlightened. And while he plunged his body into the water, he did not enlighten his heart with the Spirit. And his body descended and ascended. But his soul was not buried with Christ, nor raised up."
"Neither does he that is baptized with water, but not found worthy of the Spirit, receive the grace in perfection."
"If the washing is applied to the body while the soul has not expelled the stains of its passions… that in these cases the water is water, since the gift of the Holy Spirit is nowhere manifest in what takes place."
Many Church Fathers explicitly placed Scripture above all other authorities, including councils, bishops, traditions, and their own writings.
"We make Sacred Scripture the rule and the norm of every doctrine. We necessarily fix our eyes upon it and approve only what may be made to harmonize with the intent of these writings."
"Whatever is not supported by the testimony of Scripture we reject as false."
"Do not, I beg you, bring in human reasoning. I shall yield to Scripture alone."
"For concerning the divine and holy mysteries of the Faith, not even a casual statement must be delivered without the Holy Scriptures; nor must we be drawn aside by mere plausibility and artifices of speech. Even to me, who tell you these things, give not absolute credence, unless you receive the proof of the things which I announce from the Divine Scriptures. For this salvation which we believe depends not on ingenious reasoning, but on demonstration of the Holy Scriptures."
"Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the Churches?"
"We are not content simply because this is the tradition of the Fathers. What is important is that the Fathers followed the meaning of Scripture."
"Let the inspired Scriptures then be our umpire, and the vote of truth will be given to those whose dogmas are found to agree with the Divine words."
"It is impossible either to say or fully to understand anything about God beyond what has been divinely proclaimed to us, whether told or revealed, by the sacred declarations of the Old and New Testaments."
"Therefore let God-inspired Scripture decide between us; and on whichever side be found doctrines in harmony with the word of God, in favor of that side will be cast the vote of truth."
"In the matters of which we are now treating, only the canonical writings have any weight with us."
"I have learned to yield this respect and honor only to the canonical books of Scripture: of these alone do I most firmly believe that the authors were completely free from error."
"Vainly then do they run about with the pretext that they have demanded Councils for the faith's sake; for divine Scripture is sufficient above all things; but if a Council be needed on the point, there are the proceedings of the Fathers, for the Nicene Bishops did not neglect this matter, but stated the doctrine so exactly, that persons reading their words honestly, cannot but be reminded by them of the religion towards Christ announced in divine Scripture."
"Let those things be removed from our midst which we quote against each other not from divine canonical books but from elsewhere. Someone may perhaps ask: Why do you want to remove these things from the midst? Because I do not want the holy church proved by human documents but by divine oracles."
"Whatever they may adduce, and whatever they may quote from, let us rather, if we are His sheep, hear the voice of our Shepherd. Therefore let us search for the church in the sacred canonical Scriptures."
While Protestants believe that apostolic traditions and customs of the church exist, they are not essential to salvation. Everything necessary for salvation is found in Scripture. The apostle John affirmed that Jesus taught things not included in scripture (John 21:25), but he also said the gospel is enough (John 20:31). Historically, Rome held to a "two-source theory" of revelation, believing that scripture and tradition were two separate deposits of doctrines. Therefore, scripture was understood to be insufficient.
"There is, brethren, one God, the knowledge of whom we gain from the Holy Scriptures, and from no other source."
"The holy and inspired Scriptures are fully sufficient for the proclamation of the truth."
"Enjoying as you do the consolation of the holy Scriptures, you stand in need neither of my assistance nor of that of anybody else… You have the all-sufficient counsel and guidance of the Holy Spirit to lead you to what is right."
"Believe me not in whatsoever I shall simply deliver, unless thou find the things which I shall speak demonstrated out of the Holy Scriptures. For our salvation ought not to rest upon human testimony, but upon the demonstration of the Holy Scriptures."
"For since all cannot read the Scriptures, some being hindered as to the knowledge of them by want of learning, and others by a want of leisure, in order that the soul may not perish from ignorance, we comprise the whole doctrine of the Faith in a few lines [the Creed]. This summary I wish you both to commit to memory when I recite it and to rehearse it with all diligence among yourselves, not writing it out on paper, but engraving it by the memory upon your heart."
"We are not entitled to such license, namely, of affirming whatever we please. For we make Sacred Scripture the rule and the norm of every doctrine. Upon that we are obliged to fix our eyes, and we approve only whatever can be brought into harmony with the intent of these writings."
"There comes a heathen and says, I wish to become a Christian, but I know not whom to join… if we bid you believe the Scriptures, and these are simple and true, the decision is easy for you. If any agree with the Scriptures, he is a Christian; if any fight against them, he is far from this rule."
"Whatever is not supported by the testimony of Scripture we reject as false."
"What more shall I teach you than what we read in the apostles? For Holy Scripture fixes the rule for our doctrine, lest we dare be wiser than we ought. Therefore I should not teach you anything else except to expound to you the words of the Teacher."
"This shows that the established authority of Scripture must outweigh every other; for it derives new confirmation from the progress of events which happen, as Scripture proves, in fulfillment of the predictions made so long before their occurrence."
"All things, therefore, that have been delivered to us by the Law, and Prophets, and Apostles, we receive, and acknowledge, and confess; and beyond these, we seek not to know anything. For it is impossible for us to say, or at all think anything concerning God, beyond what has been divinely declared by the divine oracles of the Old and New Testament."
"But as we do not deny what is written, so we do reject what is not written."
"Among the things that are plainly laid down in Scripture are to be found all matters that concern faith and the manner of life."
"Whatever is required for salvation is already completely fulfilled in the Scriptures."
Some argue that Scripture is obscure and requires an authoritative tradition and teaching office to interpret it. However, this is not the belief of the Church Fathers, who taught that Scripture is plain, clear, and understandable by all through careful reading.
"Since, therefore, the entire Scriptures, the prophets, and the Gospels, can be clearly, unambiguously, and harmoniously understood by all… they proclaim one only God, to the exclusion of all others, formed all things by His word."
"And they [heretics] assert that the Scriptures are ambiguous, and that the truth cannot be extracted from them by those who are ignorant of tradition."
"But which [doctrine] am I to believe, knowing as I do nothing at all of the Scriptures? The others also allege the same thing for themselves. What then if the other comes, and says that the Scripture has this, and you that it has something different, and you interpret the Scriptures diversely, dragging their sense (each his own way)? And you then, I ask, have you no understanding, no judgment?"
"Sometimes heretics quote from the prophetic Scriptures, but they misuse them in several ways: first, they don't make use of all the Scriptures. Second, when they do cite a passage, they don't quote it in its entirety… they gather a few expressions here and there, not looking to the meaning, but making use of the mere words, while altering the meaning."
"And this signified that the Scripture is clear to all, when taken according to the bare reading; and that this is the faith which occupies the place of the rudiments."
"All things are clear and open that are in the divine Scriptures; the necessary things are all plain."
"For among the things that are plainly laid down in Scripture are to be found all matters that concern faith and the manner of life."
"You exaggerate 'how difficult the knowledge of the sacred scriptures is,' claiming that 'it is suited for only the learned few.'"
While tradition has an essential role in the Christian life, the Church Fathers believed that tradition, including their own writings and those of other bishops, can err and be corrected by Scripture.
De Spiritu Sancto, c. 375 AD
"We are not content simply because this is the tradition of the Fathers. What is important is that the Fathers followed the meaning of Scripture."
Commentary on Galatians, c. 387 AD
"I place the Apostles in a distinct rank from all other writers — for as for them, they always speak truth — but as for those other, they err sometimes, like men as they were."
"The sacred canon of Scripture… stands so absolutely in a superior position to all later letters of the bishops, that about it we can have no doubt or disputation at all — whether what is written in it is true and right; but the letters of bishops which have been written, or are being written, since the closing of the canon, are liable to be refuted if there be anything in them which strays from the truth either by the discourse of some one who happens to be wiser in the matter than themselves, or by the weightier authority and more learned experience of other bishops, by the authority of Councils; and further, that the Councils themselves, which are held in the several districts and provinces, must yield, beyond all possibility of doubt, to the authority of plenary Councils which are formed for the whole Christian world; and that even of the plenary Councils, the earlier are often corrected by those which follow them"
"As to all other writings, in reading them, however great the superiority of the authors to myself in sanctity and learning, I do not accept their teaching as true on the mere ground of the opinion being held by them; but only because they have succeeded in convincing my judgment of its truth either by means of these canonical writings themselves, or by arguments addressed to my reason."
"For the reasonings of any men whatsoever, even though they be Catholics, and of high reputation, are not to be treated by us in the same way as the canonical Scriptures are treated. We are at liberty, without doing any violence to the respect which these men deserve, to condemn and reject anything in their writings, if perchance we shall find that they have entertained opinions differing from that which others or we ourselves have, by the divine help, discovered to be the truth. I deal thus with the writings of others, and I wish my intelligent readers to deal thus with mine."
c. 400 AD
"As regards our writings, which are not a rule of faith or practice, but only a help to edification, we may suppose that they contain some things falling short of the truth in obscure and recondite matters, and that these mistakes may or may not be corrected in subsequent treatises... Such writings are read with the right of judgment, and without any obligation to believe. In order to leave room for such profitable discussions of difficult questions, there is a distinct boundary line separating all productions subsequent to apostolic times from the authoritative canonical books of the Old and New Testaments."
On the Unity of the Church, c. 405 AD
"We ought to find the Church, as the Head of the Church, in the Holy Canonical Scriptures, not to inquire for it in the various reports, and opinions, and deeds, and words, and visions of men."
"It is the doctrine of the Holy Spirit which is set forth in the canonical writings, and if the councils declare anything against it, I hold it to be wicked."
"Neither dare one agree with Catholic bishops if by chance they err in anything, with the result that their opinion is against the canonical scriptures of God."
Protestants are often charged with removing books from the Bible. However the early church did not have a consensus on the canon. A few in the West but several more in the East disputed the deuterocanonical books: some appreciated their value to the Church but did not consider them Scripture; others rejected them completely. These quotes do not support an identical protestant canon, as there are often a few oddities, such as Revelation or Esther being omitted, but they are closest to the Hebrew canon. It's also worth noting that some fathers described a twenty-two book canon in reference to the Hebrew bible that Protestants use — they simply counted the books differently at the time to tie it to the Hebrew alphabet.
"Pray, read none of the apocryphal writings: for why do you, who know not those which are acknowledged among all, trouble yourself in vain about those which are disputed? Read the Divine Scriptures, the twenty-two books of the Old Testament, these that have been translated by the Seventy-two Interpreters."
"[lists the canon]…Thus far constitutes the Old Testament…there are other books besides these not indeed included in the Canon, but appointed by the Fathers to be read by those who newly join us, and who wish for instruction in the word of godliness. The Wisdom of Solomon, and the Wisdom of Sirach, and Esther, and Judith, and Tobit, and that which is called the Teaching of the Apostles, and the Shepherd. But the former, my brethren, are included in the Canon, the latter being [merely] read; nor is there in any place a mention of apocryphal writings."
"And so there are also twenty-two books of the Old Testament [protestant canon counted differently]…we may be assured that what is not found in our list must be placed amongst the Apocryphal writings. Wisdom, therefore, which generally bears the name of Solomon, and the book of Jesus, the Son of Sirach, and Judith, and Tobias, and the Shepherd are not in the canon. The first book of Maccabees I have found to be Hebrew, the second is Greek, as can be proved from the very style."
"Therefore, just as the Church also reads the books of Judith, Tobias, and the Maccabees, but does not receive them among the canonical Scriptures, so also one may read these two scrolls for the strengthening of the people, (but) not for confirming the authority of ecclesiastical dogmas."
"The reason for reckoning twenty-two books of the Old Testament is that this corresponds with the number of the [Hebrew] letters."
"When expounding the first Psalm, he [Origen] gives a catalogue of the sacred Scriptures of the Old Testament as follows: 'It should be stated that the canonical books, as the Hebrews have handed them down, are twenty-two; corresponding with the number of their letters.'"
"Observe, further, that there are two and twenty books of the Old Testament, one for each letter of the Hebrew tongue. For there are twenty-two letters of which five are double, and so they come to be twenty-seven. For the letters Caph, Mere, Nun, Pe, Sade are double. And thus the number of the books in this way is twenty-two, but is found to be twenty-seven because of the double character of five."
"Receive the number and names of the holy books… These twenty-two books of the Old Testament are counted according to the twenty-two letters of the Jews…"
"Accordingly when I went East and came to the place where these things were preached and done, I learned accurately the books of the Old Testament, and send them to you as written below. Their names are as follows: Of Moses, five books: Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus, Deuteronomy; Jesus Nave, Judges, Ruth; of Kings, four books; of Chronicles, two; the Psalms of David, the Proverbs of Solomon, Wisdom also [likely Proverbs but debated], Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Job; of Prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah; of the twelve prophets, one book; Daniel, Ezekiel, Esdras."
"Let no private psalms nor any uncanonical books be read in church, but only the canonical ones of the New and Old Testament…These are all the books of Old Testament appointed to be read: 1, Genesis of the world; 2, The Exodus from Egypt; 3, Leviticus; 4, Numbers; 5, Deuteronomy; 6, Joshua, the son of Nun; 7, Judges, Ruth; 8, Esther; 9, Of the Kings, First and Second; 10, Of the Kings, Third and Fourth; 11, Chronicles, First and Second; 12, Esdras, First and Second; 13, The Book of Psalms; 14, The Proverbs of Solomon; 15, Ecclesiastes; 16, The Song of Songs; 17, Job; 18, The Twelve Prophets; 19, Isaiah; 20, Jeremiah, and Baruch, the Lamentations, and the Epistle; 21, Ezekiel; 22, Daniel."
"For if you were begotten from the Holy Spirit and instructed in the prophets and apostles, you must have gone through (the record) from the beginning of the genesis of the world until the times of Esther in twenty-seven books of the Old Covenant, which are numbered as twenty-two."
Rome emphasizes that sacred traditions are a second part of the deposit of faith given by the apostles, meaning there are infallible and necessary doctrines, not in scripture, that are only found in the church. However, Lutheran theologian Martin Chemnitz noted in his Examination of the Council of Trent that the church fathers often used the word "tradition" interchangeably with the term "scripture," "gospel," or the Christian faith in general. Occasionally, they would reference extra-biblical teachings, with Basil even calling them equally authoritative to scripture. However, the practices they present are non-essential, many of which neither Rome nor the East practices today, such as tasting milk and honey in baptism.
"That alone is the true life-giving faith, which the church received from the apostles and passed on to her children… We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith."
"Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the Churches?"
"To which course many nations… carefully preserving the ancient tradition, believing in one God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things therein, by means of Christ Jesus, the Son of God; who, because of His surpassing love towards His creation, condescended to be born of the virgin, He Himself uniting man through Himself to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and rising again, and having been received up in splendour, shall come in glory."
"They then in like manner founded churches in every city, from which all the other churches, one after another, derived the tradition of the faith, and the seeds of doctrine, and are every day deriving them, that they may become churches."
"Of the beliefs and practices...preserved in the Church some we possess derived from written teaching; others we have received delivered to us in a mystery by the tradition of the apostles; and both of these in relation to true religion have the same force...who has taught us in writing to sign with the sign of the cross...? What writing has taught us to turn to the East at the prayer?...Which of the saints has left us in writing the words of the invocation at the displaying of the bread of the Eucharist and the cup of blessing?...we bless the water of baptism and the oil of the chrism...whence comes the custom of baptizing thrice?...from what Scripture do we derive the renunciation of Satan and his angels?"
"If no passage of Scripture has prescribed it, assuredly custom, which without doubt flowed from tradition, has confirmed it...Let us inquire, therefore, whether tradition, unless it be written, should not be admitted...When we are going to enter the water...we solemnly profess that we disown the devil...Hereupon we are thrice immersed...we taste first of all a mixture of milk and honey, and from that day we refrain from the daily bath for a whole week....we take...the sacrament of the Eucharist...We count fasting or kneeling in worship on the Lord's day to be unlawful...At every forward step and movement...we trace upon the forehead the sign."
"Even if it did not rest on the authority of Scripture, the consensus of the whole world in this respect would have the force of a command. For many other observances of the Churches, which are due to tradition, have acquired the authority of the written law, as for instance the practice of dipping the head three times in the laver, and then, after leaving the water, of tasting mingled milk and honey in representation of infancy."
Rome claims that a valid church only exists through apostolic succession, where bishops can trace their ordination to the apostles. However, several Church Fathers taught that the true church is found in the gathering of believers under correct doctrine. Additionally, apostolic succession is not described as a divine ordination but rather as a mechanism for Christians to know which churches were orthodox (and which were heretical) by tracing their presbyters to the apostles. Within this framework, early Christians often spoke of the earliest churches like Rome and Antioch as having more authority due to their apostolic origins and faithful teaching in the second century. However, this authority is conditional on faithful doctrine.
Homily on Psalms (411 AD)
"The Church does not consist in walls, but in the truths of her teachings. The Church is there where there is true faith. As a matter of fact, fifteen and twenty years ago, all the church buildings belonged to heretics [namely the Arians], for heretics twenty years ago were in possession of them; but the true Church was there where the true faith was."
Stromata (c. 198 AD)
"For it is not now the place, but the assemblage of the elect, that I call the Church."
On His Own Life (c. 382 AD)
"For unity in doctrine deserves unity in office; and a rival teacher sets up a rival throne; the one is a successor in reality, the other in name only."
On the Prescription of Heretics (c. 200 AD)
"Let them [heretics] unfold the roll of their bishops, running down in due succession from the beginning in such a manner that that first bishop of theirs shall be able to show for his ordainer and predecessor some one of the apostles or of apostolic men — a man, moreover, who continued steadfast with the apostles. For this is the manner in which the apostolic churches transmit their registers… should they even effect the contrivance, they will not advance a step."
On the Prescription of Heretics (c. 200 AD)
"We hold communion with the apostolic churches because our doctrine is in no respect different from theirs. This is our witness of apostolicity."
On the Prescription of Heretics (c. 200 AD)
"To this test, therefore will they be submitted for proof by those churches, who, although they derive not their founder from apostles or apostolic men (as being of much later date, for they are in fact being founded daily), yet, since they agree in the same faith, they are accounted as not less apostolic because they are akin in doctrine."
On the Unity of the Church, c. 405 AD
"Whoever dissents from the sacred Scriptures, even if they are found in all places in which the church is designated, are not the church."
On the Unity of the Church
"All such things then removed, let them demonstrate their Church, if they can, not in the speeches and murmurs of African, not in the councils of their bishops, not in the epistles of whatever debates, not in false signs and prodigies, since we are prepared and cautioned against them by the word of the Lord, but in the precept of the law, in the predictions of the prophets, in the songs of the psalms, in the utterances of the one shepherd himself, in the preaching of the evangelists, that is in all the canonical authority of the holy books, and not such that they might gather and cite things that are spoken obscurely or ambiguously or metaphorically which anyone might interpret according to his own opinion as he wishes. Such things cannot be properly understood and explained unless first those things that are said most openly are held with a strong faith."
Exposition of the Holy Gospel according to Saint Luke
"So the faith of the church must be sought first and foremost. If Christ is to dwell in a house, it undoubtedly must be chosen. But lest an unbelieving people or a heretical teacher deface its home, the church is commanded that the fellowship of heretics be avoided and the synagogue shunned....Any church which rejects faith and does not possess the foundations of apostolic preaching is to be abandoned lest it be able to stain others with unbelief."
Against Heresies
"But, again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, [and] which is preserved by means of the succession of presbyters in the Churches."
Against Heresies
"In this order, and by this succession, the ecclesiastical tradition from the apostles, and the preaching of the truth, have come down to us. And this is most abundant proof that there is one and the same vivifying faith, which has been preserved in the Church from the apostles until now, and handed down in truth."
Against Heresies
"But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition"
Protestants and Catholics have made a lot of progress in aligning their views on justification in recent years. Both agree that works are necessary but not causal for salvation. Despite the difference between imputed and infused righteousness, the major difference is not in the salvific role of faith, but rather in the need for penance. Nevertheless, Sola Fide is a cornerstone of the Reformation. Surprisingly, salvation was not one of the primary doctrines fleshed out in the early church. So the church fathers are not always clear and sometimes disagree on the role of faith and works in the Christian life. However, several fathers did make clear statements supporting salvation by faith alone.
"And so we, having been called through His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified through ourselves or our own wisdom or understanding or piety, or works that we have done in holiness of heart, but through faith, by which the Almighty God has justified all who have existed from the beginning."
"Indeed, this is the perfect and complete glorification of God, when one does not exult in his own righteousness, but recognizing oneself as lacking true righteousness to be justified by faith alone in Christ."
"Because faith alone justifies… publicans and prostitutes will be first in the kingdom of heaven."
"They said that he who adhered to faith alone was cursed; but he, Paul, shows that he who adhered to faith alone is blessed."
"He made his way into paradise...on the basis of faith alone."
"For he died for us, and further reconciled us, and brought us to Himself, and gave us grace unspeakable. But we brought faith only as our contribution."
"Wherefore let no man glory in works, for by his works no man shall be justified, for he that is just hath a free gift, for he is justified by the Bath. It is faith then which delivers by the blood of Christ."
"Here he shows God's power, in that He has not only saved, but has even justified, and led them to boasting — and this too without needing works, but looking for faith only."
"For you believe the faith; why then do you add other things, as if faith were not sufficient to justify? You make yourselves captive, and you subject yourself to the law."
"The declaring of his righteousness also means that not only is he himself righteous but that he also makes those who are filled with the putrefying sores of sin instantaneously righteous. And in order to further explain what he means by this 'declaring,' he has added, 'That he might be just, and the justifier of him who believes in Jesus.' Have no doubt, then, for it is not of works but of faith."
"To this end has His grace and goodness been formed upon us in Christ Jesus: that being dead according to works, redeemed through faith and saved by grace, we might receive the gift of this great deliverance."
"By mercy then is signified, Justification and grace in Christ, even that which is by faith. For we have been justified, not by the works of the law that we have done, but by His great mercy."
"We need none of those legal observances, he says; faith suffices to obtain for us the Spirit, and by Him righteousness, and many and great benefits."
"And he well said, 'a righteousness of mine own,' not that which I gained by labor and toil, but that which I found from grace… the righteousness of God; this is altogether a gift. And the gifts of God far exceed those worthless good deeds, which are due to our own diligence."
"But he calls it their 'own righteousness,' either because the Law was no longer of force, or because it was one of trouble and toil. But this he calls God's righteousness, that from faith, because it comes entirely from the grace from above, and because men are justified in this case, not by labors, but by the gift of God."
"For the dwellers upon earth have been justified by faith… Faith then in Christ is found to be the pledge to us of these great blessings: for it is the way that leadeth unto life."
"Human beings can be saved from the ancient wound of the serpent in no other way than by believing in him who, when he was raised up from the earth on the tree of martyrdom in the likeness of sinful flesh, drew all things to himself and gave life to the dead."
"God will impute righteousness to those who believe in him, and make the just live through him, and declare the Gentiles to be his children through faith."
"Confess Jesus Christ, and believe that He is risen from the dead, and you will be saved. For indeed righteousness is only to be believed; but a complete salvation must also be confessed and knowledge must be added to confidence."
"We conclude that a man is not justified by the precepts of a holy life, but by faith in Jesus Christ; in a word, not by the law of works, but by the law of faith; not by the letter, but by the spirit; not by the merits of deeds, but by free grace."
Penal Substitutionary Atonement teaches that Christ took on our punishment for sin on the cross, allowing us to be made righteous (Col 2:13, Heb 9:24, 1 Peter 2:24, 2 Cor 5:21, Isaiah 54:4). This doctrine is largely rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Church, who argue that it is a Reformation-era novelty. In fact, it is expressed in some of the earliest Christian voices.
"O the sweet exchange, O the incomprehensible work of God, O the unexpected blessings — that the sinfulness of many should be hidden in one righteous person, while the righteousness of one should justify many sinners."
"The Word, being Himself incapable of death, assumed a mortal body, that He might offer it as His own in place of all — and suffering for the sake of all through His union with it, might bring to nought him that had the power of death, that is, the devil."
"But since it was necessary also that the debt owing from all should be paid again, for… it was owing that all should die… he next offered up his sacrifice also on behalf of all, yielding his temple to death in the stead of all, in order firstly to make men quit and free of their old trespass, and further to show himself more powerful even than death, displaying his own body incorruptible as first fruits of the resurrection of all."
"Hanging on the tree as our substitute, bearing our punishment… Christ, though guiltless, took our punishment, that He might cancel our guilt, and do away with our punishment."
"Christ was nailed to the cross, paying the penalty not for His own sins but paying the debt of our nature. For our nature was in debt after transgressing the laws of its maker. And since it was in debt and unable to pay, the creator Himself in His wisdom devised a way of paying the debt. By taking a human body as capital, he invested it wisely and justly in paying the debt and thereby freeing human nature."
"To this curse, I say, people were subject, for no man had continued in, or was a keeper of, the whole Law; but Christ exchanged this curse for the other, Cursed is every one that hangs on a tree...it was like an innocent man's undertaking to die for another sentenced to death, and so rescuing him from punishment. For Christ took upon Him not the curse of transgression, but the other curse, in order to remove that of others."
"Thus He offered Himself to the death of the accursed that He might break the curse of the Law, offering Himself voluntarily a victim to God the Father, in order that by means of a voluntary victim the curse which attended the discontinuance of the regular victim might be removed…Of which offering the holy Apostle thus speaks: 'This He died once for all when He offered Himself up,' securing complete salvation for the human race by the offering of this holy, perfect victim."
"In this he shows that Christ, being apart from all sin, will receive the sins of men on himself. And therefore he will suffer the penalty of sinners, and will be pained on their behalf; and not on his own."
"[Jesus was] chastised on our behalf, and suffered a penalty he did not owe, but which we owed because of the multitude of our sins; and so he became the cause of the forgiveness of our sins, because he received death for us, and transferred to Himself the scourging."
"But beyond all this, there was a debt owing which needs be paid; for, as I said before, all men were due to die. Here, then, is the second reason why the Word dwelt among us, namely that having proved His Godhead by His works, He might offer the sacrifice on behalf of all, surrendering his own temple to death in place of all, to settle man's account with death and free him from the primal transgression."
"Formerly the world, as guilty, was under judgment from the Law; but now the Word has taken on Himself the judgment, and having suffered in the body for all, has bestowed salvation to all."
"The death which is ascribed to Him may be a redemption of the sin of men."
"God's grace has allowed Him that did no wrong to be punished for those who had done wrong… Him that was righteousness itself, 'He made sin,' that is, allowed Him to be condemned as a sinner, as one cursed to die, so that we might be, not just 'righteous' but 'righteousness,' indeed the righteousness of God."
Rome itself recognizes that she has made errors throughout history. However, most apologists argue that this is a non-issue, emphasizing that the Magisterium only exercises infallibility under rare circumstances; therefore, all of these errors are fallibly defined and do not disprove Roman infallibility. However, one issue is greatly overlooked: the Magisterium still requires submission of mind and will to fallible teachings, and therefore to potential errors. While this may not disprove the narrowly defined view of papal infallibility, the existence of binding moral errors still invalidates Catholic claims to guide believers into the truth of faith and morals. Catholics at various points in history had to submit to moral scandals, including approving the burning of heretics as the will of God, approving the abuse of indulgences, the demand for priests to divorce their wives when celibacy was first enforced, and the approval of the death penalty (which Rome now claims goes against human dignity). Intellectual errors also required submission, including the condemnation of teachings related to heliocentrism in 1616.
"Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience; and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world."
"This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will."
"A religious submission of the intellect and will must be given to a doctrine which the Supreme Pontiff or the college of bishops declares concerning faith or morals when they exercise the authentic magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim it by definitive act; therefore, the Christian faithful are to take care to avoid those things which do not agree with it."
"Although the bishops who are in communion with the head and members of the college… do not possess infallibility in teaching… the Christian faithful are bound to adhere with religious submission of mind to the authentic magisterium of their bishops."
"Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent, since in writing such Letters the Popes do not exercise the supreme power of their Teaching Authority....But if the Supreme Pontiffs in their official documents purposely pass judgment on a matter up to that time under dispute, it is obvious that that matter, according to the mind and will of the Pontiffs, cannot be any longer considered a question open to discussion among theologians."
"When the Magisterium proposes 'in a definitive way' truths concerning faith and morals, which, even if not divinely revealed, are nevertheless strictly and intimately connected with Revelation, these must be firmly accepted and held. When the Magisterium, not intending to act 'definitively', teaches a doctrine to aid a better understanding of Revelation and make explicit its contents, or to recall how some teaching is in conformity with the truths of faith, or finally to guard against ideas that are incompatible with these truths, the response called for is that of the religious submission of will and intellect. This kind of response cannot be simply exterior or disciplinary but must be understood within the logic of faith and under the impulse of obedience to the faith...The willingness to submit loyally to the teaching of the Magisterium on matters per se not irreformable must be the rule."
This section will not dive into the Church Fathers but rather the ecumenical councils of the medieval period. In evaluating the claims of the Roman Catholic Church, exposing errors and contradictions throughout history is equally valuable to seeing discontinuity with the earliest Christians. Rome claims that her value stems from her ability to infallibly guide believers into truth and morality. However, we see many instances where the church has contradicted herself infallibly or guided believers into moral error.
Some, including Pope Paul VI in 1966, claimed that Vatican II was only pastoral and did not issue any infallible dogma. Therefore it cannot be used to illustrate contradictions. However, the Catholic Catechism clearly supports Vatican II's infallibility, claiming the markers of infallibility exist wherever the college of bishops gathers under the pope.
"The infallibility promised to the Church is also present in the body of bishops when, together with Peter's successor, they exercise the supreme Magisterium, above all in an Ecumenical Council."
Some apologists will appeal to the development of doctrine hypothesis popularized by Cardinal John Henry Newman, suggesting that there are no contradictions, instead doctrines are organically developing over time. However, Vatican I rejects this perspective, teaching that dogmas cannot be reinterpreted from their original meaning.
"The meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding."
"Some of these errors [of Luther] we have decided to include in the present document; their substance is as follows: That heretics be burned is against the will of the Spirit."
"[Heretics] are to be coerced — as are thieves and bandits — into confessing their errors and accusing others, although one must stop short of danger to life or limb."
"Torture, which uses physical or moral violence to extract confessions, punish the guilty, frighten opponents, or satisfy hatred, is contrary to respect for the person and for human dignity."
"It firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart 'into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels' [Matt. 25:41], unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."
"We declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff."
"But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place amongst these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind. Nor is God far distant from those who in shadows and images seek the unknown God, for it is He who gives to all men life and breath and all things, and as Saviour wills that all men be saved. Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience."
"The unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation."
"The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter. Those who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church. With the Orthodox churches, this communion is so profound that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord's Eucharist."
"For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect...But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body, and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church."
"Another kind of lawful slaying belongs to the civil authorities, to whom is entrusted power of life and death, by the legal and judicious exercise of which they punish the guilty and protect the innocent. The just use of this power, far from involving the crime of murder, is an act of paramount obedience to this Commandment which prohibits murder. The end of the Commandment is the preservation and security of human life. Now the punishments inflicted by the civil authority, which is the legitimate avenger of crime, naturally tend to this end, since they give security to life by repressing outrage and violence. Hence these words of David: In the morning I put to death all the wicked of the land, that I might cut off all the workers of iniquity from the city of the Lord."
"Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person' and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide."
"If any one denieth, either that sacramental confession was instituted, or is necessary to salvation, of divine right; or saith, that the manner of confessing secretly to a priest alone, which the Church hath ever observed from the beginning, and doth observe, is alien from the institution and command of Christ, and is a human invention; let him be anathema."
"Over the centuries the concrete form in which the Church has exercised this power received from the Lord has varied considerably. During the seventh century Irish missionaries, inspired by the Eastern monastic tradition, took to continental Europe the private practice of penance… From that time on, the sacrament has been performed in secret between penitent and priest."
"Constituting a general council, representing the catholic church militant, has power immediately from Christ, and that everyone of whatever state or dignity, even papal, is bound to obey."
"None may reopen the judgment of the Apostolic See [the pope], than whose authority there is no greater, nor can any lawfully review its judgment. Wherefore they err from the right path of truth who assert that it is lawful to appeal from the judgments of the Roman pontiffs to an ecumenical council, as to an authority higher than that of the Roman pontiff."
"Wherefore we teach and declare that, by divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other Church, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both episcopal and immediate. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world."
"This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it."
"Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true."
"Justice therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State...to treat various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges. Since then, the profession of one religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed which alone is true."
"The right to this immunity continues to exist even in those who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering to it....everybody has the duty and consequently the right to seek the truth in religious matters so that, through the use of appropriate means, he may prudently form judgments of conscience which are sincere and true. The search for truth, however, must be carried out in a manner that is appropriate to the dignity of the human person and his social nature, namely, by free enquiry with the help of teaching or instruction, communication and dialogue....Therefore government is to assume the safeguard of the religious freedom of all its citizens, in an effective manner, by just laws and by other appropriate means....the right of all citizens and religious communities to religious freedom should be recognized and made effective in practice."
"This being so, it is clear that the Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ. Shall We suffer, what would indeed be iniquitous, the truth, and a truth divinely revealed, to be made a subject for compromise?"
"Today, in many parts of the world, under the inspiring grace of the Holy Spirit, many efforts are being made in prayer, word and action to attain that fullness of unity which Jesus Christ desires. The Sacred Council exhorts all the Catholic faithful to recognize the signs of the times and to take an active and intelligent part in the work of ecumenism. The term 'ecumenical movement' indicates the initiatives and activities planned and undertaken, according to the various needs of the Church and as opportunities offer, to promote Christian unity."
"In certain special circumstances, such as the prescribed prayers 'for unity,' and during ecumenical gatherings, it is allowable, indeed desirable that Catholics should join in prayer with their separated brethren. Such prayers in common are certainly an effective means of obtaining the grace of unity, and they are a true expression of the ties which still bind Catholics to their separated brethren. 'For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.'"
"Both swords, therefore, are in the power of the Church, that is to say, the spiritual and the material sword. But the former is to be administered for the Church but the latter by the Church; the former in the hands of the priest; the latter by the hands of kings and soldiers, but at the will and sufferance of the priest."
"If however a temporal lord, required and instructed by the church, neglects to cleanse his territory of this heretical filth, he shall be bound with the bond of excommunication."
"That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error."
"Christ, to be sure, gave His Church no proper mission in the political, economic or social order."
Eastern Orthodoxy is a beautiful tradition that includes the desert fathers, an emphasis on divine participation, and a liturgy centered on bringing heaven to earth. Protestants critique the East's lack of a few biblical doctrines, including original sin, the Filioque, and forensic justification. The Reformers also challenged errors in their tradition, such as their infallible declaration, at Nicea II, that icon veneration was practiced by the apostles. Nevertheless, the East gets a lot more right than they get wrong. Although a church should not be measured quantitatively but qualitatively, asking whether they are right on the most important issues. Unfortunately, Orthodoxy has historically taught that there is no salvation outside its communion and they've considered the non-Orthodox to be anathema, with Nicea II saying, "an anathema is nothing less than complete separation from God". This is a major issue that disregards 80% of all Christians worldwide. Modern Orthodox theologians attempt to soften this exclusivism, saying "we can know where the Church is, but not where it isn't." However, this notion is incompatible with the broader tradition, which teaches that Western Christians have no church, no sacraments, no Holy Spirit, and are anathematized heretics akin to Arians.
"The dignity of the Bishop is so necessary in the Church, that without him, neither Church nor Christian could either be or be spoken of. For he, as a successor of the Apostles, having received in continued succession by the imposition of hands...is a fountain of all the Mysteries [Sacraments] of the Catholic Church, through which we obtain salvation. And he is, we suppose, as necessary to the Church as breath is to man, or the sun to the world."
"When these [Protestants] forsake the Church, they are forsaken by the Holy Spirit, and there remains in them neither understanding nor light, but only darkness and blindness."
"The Western Church, from the tenth century downwards, has privily brought into herself through the papacy various and strange and heretical doctrines and innovations, and so she has been torn away and removed far from the true and orthodox Church of Christ. How necessary, then, it is for you to come back and return to the ancient and unadulterated doctrines of the Church in order to attain the salvation in Christ after which you press."
"To have part in His salvation, we must necessarily be members of his body, that is, of the Catholic church."
"The One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, following in the steps of the holy Fathers, both Eastern and Western, proclaimed of old to our progenitors and again teaches today synodically, that the said novel doctrine of the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son is essentially heresy, and its maintainers, whoever they be, are heretics, according to the sentence of Pope St. Damasus, and that the congregations of such are also heretical, and that all spiritual communion in worship of the orthodox sons of the Catholic Church with such is unlawful."
"That Faith has long ago been sealed in completeness [in the orthodox church], not to admit of diminution or increase, or any change whatever; and he who dares to do, or advise, or think of such a thing has already denied the faith of Christ, has already of his own accord been struck with an eternal anathema, for blaspheming the Holy Ghost as not having spoken fully in the Scriptures and through the Ecumenical Councils."
"Anathema to those who do not salute the holy and venerable images. Anathema to those who say that the making of images is a diabolical invention and not a tradition of our holy Fathers."
"An anathema is nothing less than complete separation from God."
"Of these heresies diffused, with what sufferings the LORD hath known, over a great part of the world, was formerly Arianism, and at present is the Papacy."
"The greater part, however, of their successors, the Popes of Rome, enticed by the antisynodical privileges offered them for the oppression of the Churches of God ... changed the ancient worship at will, separating themselves by novelties from the old received Christian Polity. Nor did they cease their endeavors, by lawless projects (as veritable history assures us), to entice the other four Patriarchates into their apostasy from Orthodoxy, and so subject the Catholic Church to the whims and ordinances of men."
"These illustrious men proved indeed on this point the truth of the words of our holy father Basil the sublime, when he said, from experience, concerning the Bishops of the West, and particularly of the Pope: 'They neither know the truth nor endure to learn it, striving against those who tell them the truth, and strengthening themselves in their heresy' (to Eusebius of Samosata). Thus, after a first and second brotherly admonition, knowing their impenitence, shaking them off and avoiding them, they gave them over to their reprobate mind. 'War is better than peace, apart from God,' as said our holy father Gregory, concerning the Arians."
"This Mystery of the Sacred Eucharist can be performed by none other, except only by an Orthodox Priest, who has received his priesthood from an Orthodox and Canonical Bishop, in accordance with the teaching of the Eastern Church."
Matthew 16:18 is the foundational text for the Papacy, where Christ says, "You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church." However, George Salmon notes that only 17 out of 85 patristic references to Matthew 16 refer to Peter as the rock. The rest hold the rock to be his confession of faith, Christ himself, or apply to all believers who make the same confession.
"The rock is Christ, Who gave to His apostles, that they also should be called rocks, 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church.'"
"For, 'Thou art Peter' and not 'Thou art the rock' was said to him. But 'the rock was Christ,' in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called Peter. But let the reader decide which of these two opinions is the more probable."
"But if you suppose that upon that one Peter only the whole church is built by God, what would you say about John the son of thunder or each one of the Apostles? Shall we otherwise dare to say, that against Peter in particular the gates of Hades shall not prevail, but that they shall prevail against the other Apostles and the perfect?"
"For the Church cannot be moved because it is known to have been founded on that most solid rock, namely, Christ the Lord..."
"You are Peter and on this rock from which you have taken your name, that is, on myself, I will build my Church."
"The Church is founded upon Peter, although in another place, the same thing is done upon all the Apostles..."
Several Church Fathers interpreted the "rock" of Matthew 16:18 not as Peter's person but as the confession he made — "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." On this reading, every believer who makes that same confession stands on the same foundation.
"The foundation of the Church: for it was not said of Peter's flesh, but of his faith."
"'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church' — that is, on the faith of his confession."
"Jesus said to divine Peter: 'You are Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church.' Now by the word 'rock', Jesus indicated, I think, the immoveable faith of the disciple."
"Wherefore the Lord says to Peter: 'Upon this rock I shall build my Church,' that is, upon this confession of the catholic faith I shall establish the faithful in life."
"Thus our one immovable foundation, our one blissful rock of faith, is the confession from Peter's mouth, You are the Son of the living God."
"Hence I ask, was it that the blessed Simon Bar-Jona confessed to Him, 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God?' ... And this is the rock of confession whereon the Church is built ... that Christ must be not only named, but believed, the Son of God. This faith is that which is the foundation of the Church; through this faith the gates of hell cannot prevail against her. This is the faith which has the keys of the kingdom of heaven."
"If we, too, have said like Peter, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God' [Matt. 16:16]...we become a Peter. So, to us there might be said by the Word, 'You are Peter.' For every disciple of Christ is a rock...And upon every such rock is built every word of the church...it is said to Peter, and to every Peter, I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven."
"Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter's confession. What is Peter's confession? 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' There's the rock for you, there's the foundation, there's where the Church has been built, which the gates of the underworld cannot conquer."
"Now Christ called this confession a rock, and he named the one who confessed it 'Peter,' perceiving the appellation which was suitable to the author of this confession. For this is the solemn rock of religion, this the basis of salvation, this the wall of faith and the foundation of truth: 'For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus.' To whom be glory and power forever."
Several Fathers acknowledged a real primacy for Peter, but understood it as symbolic rather than jurisdictional. It represents the unity of believers and was designed to prevent schism, not a supreme divine office.
"But you say the Church was founded upon Peter: although elsewhere the same is attributed to all the Apostles, and they all receive the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and the strength of the Church depends upon them all alike, yet one among the twelve is chosen so that when a head has been appointed, there may be no occasion for schism."
"The Church, therefore, which is founded in Christ received from Him the keys of the kingdom of heaven in the person of Peter, that is to say, the power of binding and loosing sins. For what the Church is essentially in Christ, such representatively is Peter in the rock (petra); and in this representation Christ is to be understood as the Rock, Peter as the Church."
"that He might set forth unity, He arranged by His authority the origin of that unity, as beginning from one. Assuredly, the rest of the apostles were also the same as was Peter, endowed with a like partnership both of honour and power; but the beginning proceeds from unity."
"...the churches were governed by a common council of the priests. But after each one began think that those whom he had baptized were his own and not Christ's, it was decreed for the whole world that one of the priests should be elected to preside over the others, to whom the entire care of the church should pertain, and the seeds of schism would be removed.
Rome claims that even if all the apostles had the authority to bind and loose, the keys to the kingdom were given exclusively to Peter. However, the fathers often saw the keys and binding power as interchangeable, both of which were given to the church as a whole.
"[John the Apostle] The son of thunder, the beloved of Christ, the pillar of the Churches throughout the world, who holds the keys of heaven."
"Did Peter receive the keys and Paul not receive them? Did Peter receive them, and John and James and the other apostles not receive them?... What was given to Peter was given to the whole church."
"If, because the Lord has said to Peter, 'Upon this rock will I build My Church, to you have I given the keys of the heavenly kingdom; or, Whatsoever you shall have bound or loosed in earth, shall be bound or loosed in the heavens,' you therefore presume that the power of binding and loosing has derived to you, that is, to every Church akin to Peter."
"Are the keys of the kingdom of heaven given by the Lord to Peter only, and will no other of the blessed receive them? But if this promise be common to the others, how shall not all the things previously spoken of, and the things which are subjoined as having been addressed to Peter, be common to them?...For in this place these words seem to be addressed as to Peter only... but in the Gospel of John the Saviour having given the Holy Spirit unto the disciples by breathing upon them said, 'Receive the Holy Spirit.' Many then will say to the Saviour, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God;'...And if any one says this to Him...he will obtain the things that were spoken according to the letter of the Gospel to that Peter, but, as the spirit of the Gospel teaches, to every one who becomes such as that Peter was. For all bear the surname of 'rock' who are the imitators of Christ, that is, of the spiritual rock which followed those who are being saved."
"But you say the Church was founded upon Peter: although elsewhere the same is attributed to all the Apostles, and they all receive the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and the strength of the Church depends upon them all alike, yet one among the twelve is chosen so that when a head has been appointed, there may be no occasion for schism."
"If this was said only to Peter, it gives no ground of action to the Church. But if such is the case also in the Church, that what is bound on earth is bound in heaven, and what is loosed on earth is loosed in heaven — for when the Church excommunicates, the excommunicated person is bound in heaven; when one is reconciled by the Church, the person so reconciled is loosed in heaven — if such, then, is the case in the Church, Peter, in receiving the keys, represented the holy Church."
It's often assumed that the keys of the kingdom and the authority to bind and loose entail divine authority to establish doctrine and bind the conscience to dogma that the church decides. However, the fathers often understood it as simply the authority to excommunicate and pronounce divine truths as representatives of Christ.
"If this was said only to Peter, it gives no ground of action to the Church. But if such is the case also in the Church, that what is bound on earth is bound in heaven, and what is loosed on earth is loosed in heaven — for when the Church excommunicates, the excommunicated person is bound in heaven; when one is reconciled by the Church, the person so reconciled is loosed in heaven — if such, then, is the case in the Church, Peter, in receiving the keys, represented the holy Church."
"Whatever things you shall bind on earth; for with justice has he, who has thrice admonished and not been heard, bound him who is judged to be as a gentile... when one is bound...he remains bound."
"But when one judges unrighteously, and does not bind upon earth according to the Word of God, nor loose upon earth according to His will, the gates of Hades prevail against him...But if he [the bishop] is tightly bound with the cords of his sins, to no purpose does he bind and loose."
"[On binding and loosing] The bishops and priests do not understand this passage. They assume for themselves some of the superciliousness of the Pharisees when they either condemn the innocent or think that they can loose the guilty. Yet in the sight of God it is not the verdict of the priests but the life of the accused that is examined. We read in Leviticus about lepers that they are commanded to show themselves to the priests and, if they have leprosy, then they are established as unclean by the priest. This does not mean that the priests make them leprous and unclean, but that they have knowledge of the leprous and the non-leprous, and they can discern who is clean and who is unclean."
"He has given, therefore, the keys to His Church, that whatsoever it should bind on earth might be bound in heaven, and whatsoever it should loose on earth might be loosed in heaven; that is to say, that whosoever in the Church should not believe that his sins are remitted, they should not be remitted to him; but that whosoever should believe and should repent, and turn from his sins, should be saved by the same faith and repentance on the ground of which he is received into the bosom of the Church. For he who does not believe that his sins can be pardoned, falls into despair, and becomes worse as if no greater good remained for him than to be evil, when he has ceased to have faith in the results of his own repentance."
Rome claims that the mono-episcopacy is a unique office above the elder and deacon. However, the New Testament uses "bishop" and "elder" interchangeably to describe one office (Titus 1:5, Phil 1:1, Acts 20:28), and so do the Church Fathers. Early Christians also described churches being led by a plurality of elders/bishops, not a single bishop. The system of a single bishop ruling over a city developed in the early second century and was not instituted by Christ.
"If someone thinks that this is our opinion, but not that of the Scriptures — that bishop and priest are one...because at that time they called the same men bishops whom they also called priests, therefore he has spoken indifferently of bishops as if of priests."
"It is therefore the very same priest, who is a bishop, and before there existed men who are slanderers by instinct, [before] factions in the religion, and [before] it was said to the people, 'I am of Paul, I am of Apollos, but I am of Cephas,' the churches were governed by a common council of the priests. But after each one began to think that those whom he had baptized were his own and not Christ's, it was decreed for the whole world that one of the priests should be elected to preside over the others, to whom the entire care of the church should pertain, and the seeds of schism would be removed."
"In both epistles commandment is given that only monogamists should be chosen for the clerical office whether as bishops or as presbyters. Indeed with the ancients these names were synonymous, one alluding to the office, the other to the age of the clergy."
"The apostle clearly teaches that presbyters are the same as bishops.... When subsequently one presbyter was chosen to preside over the rest, this was done to remedy schism and to prevent each individual from rending the church of Christ by drawing it to himself.... Of the names presbyter and bishop the first denotes age, the second rank. In writing both to Titus and to Timothy the apostle speaks of the ordination of bishops and of deacons, but says not a word of the ordination of presbyters; for the fact is that the word bishops includes presbyters also."
"These things have been said in order to show that to the men of old the same men who were the priests were also the bishops; but gradually, as the seed beds of dissensions were eradicated, all solicitude was conferred on one man. Therefore, just as the priests know that by the custom of the church they are subject to the one who was previously appointed over them, so the bishops know that they, more by custom than by the truth of the Lord's arrangement, are greater than the priests. And they ought to rule the Church commonly, in imitation of Moses who, when he had under his authority to preside alone over the people of Israel, he chose the seventy by whom he could judge the people."
"Therefore, as the presbyters know that it is by the custom of the Church that they are to be subject to him who is placed over them, so let the bishops know that they are above presbyters rather by custom than by divine appointment, and ought to rule the church in common."
"Appoint for yourselves therefore bishops and deacons worthy of the Lord."
"And thus preaching through countries and cities, they appointed the first-fruits of their labors, having first proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and deacons of those who should afterwards believe. Nor was this any new thing, since indeed many ages before it was written concerning bishops and deacons. For thus saith the Scripture in a certain place, I will appoint their bishops in righteousness, and their deacons in faith."
"Bishops given to hospitality, who always gladly received into their houses the servants of God, without dissimulation. And the bishops never failed to protect, by their service, the widows, and those who were in want, and always maintained a holy conversation."
"But you will read the words in this city, along with the presbyters who preside over the Church."
Rome is meant to infallibly guide the church into truth on faith and morals as the supreme head of the church. However, the early ecumenical councils and the church fathers believed that Rome could err, making the bishop of Rome subject to excommunication or overruling by a council. The councils describe a system of regional leaders, with equal authority, where Rome's primacy was tied to its status as the imperial city. Rome did not hold a prominent place within ecumenical councils during the first millennium. None of the first 7 councils were convened by the bishop of Rome. Pope Vigilius was removed from communion for rejecting the decisions of Constantinople II. The West was not informed of the 2nd ecumenical council and did not adopt it for 100 years. The West also rejected Rome's adoption of Nicea II for centuries, holding opposing councils at Hiereia and Frankfurt. Pope Honorious was notoriously anathematized by the 6th council as a heretic.
"But that they who are at Rome do not observe those things in all cases which are handed down from the beginning, and vainly pretend the authority of the apostles."
"He [Pope Stephen] is really the schismatic who has made himself an apostate from the communion of ecclesiastical unity. For while you think that all may be excommunicated by you, you have excommunicated yourself alone from all."
"There still remained a plenary Council of the universal Church, in which these judges themselves might be put on their defense; so that, if they [Rome] were convicted of mistake, their decisions might be reversed."
"And with these we define that there shall be expelled from the holy Church of God and anathematized Honorius, who was Pope of the elder Rome, because we find in his letter to Sergius that he followed his opinion in all things and confirmed his impious doctrines."
"concerning the name of Vigilius, that it be no more inserted in the holy diptychs of the Church, on account of the impiety which he defended. Neither let it be recited by you, nor retained, either in the church of the royal city, or in other churches which are entrusted to you and to the other bishops in the State committed by God to his rule."
"Although the grace of the Holy Spirit abounded in each one of the Apostles, so that no one of them needed the counsel of another... yet they were not willing to define... until being gathered together..."
"if you [Vigilius] have written now something contrary to these things... you have condemned yourself by your own writing, since you have departed from orthodox doctrine and have defended impiety."
"Neither does any of us set himself up as a bishop of bishops, nor by tyrannical terror does any compel his colleague to the necessity of obedience; since every bishop, according to the allowance of his liberty and power, has his own proper right of judgment, and can no more be judged by another than he himself can judge another."
"The bishops are not to go beyond their dioceses to churches lying outside of their bounds, nor bring confusion on the churches; but let the Bishop of Alexandria, according to the canons, alone administer the affairs of Egypt; and let the bishops of the East manage the East alone… And let not bishops go beyond their dioceses for ordination or any other ecclesiastical ministrations, unless they be invited."
"Constantine the most devout deacon said: 'When the sentence of deposition [of Constantinople] was read, Eutyches appealed to the holy council of the most holy bishops of Rome, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Thessalonica.'"
"Let the ancient customs in Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis prevail, that the Bishop of Alexandria have jurisdiction in all these, since the like is customary for the Bishop of Rome also. Likewise in Antioch and the other provinces, let the Churches retain their privileges."
"For the Fathers rightly granted privileges to the throne of old Rome, because it was the royal city. And the One Hundred and Fifty most religious Bishops, actuated by the same consideration, gave equal privileges to the most holy throne of New Rome [Constantinople], justly judging that the city which is honoured with the Sovereignty and the Senate, and enjoys equal privileges with the old imperial Rome, should in ecclesiastical matters also be magnified as she is, and rank next after her."
"If one be called universal bishop, the universal Church goes to decay."
"[bishop of antioch is] another Peter...[who holds] the throne of Peter"
Rome and the East infallibly claim that icon veneration is an apostolic practice and consider anyone who rejects this teaching to be a heretic. Nicea II states: "Anathema to those who say that the making of images is a diabolical invention and not a tradition of our holy Fathers." However, the ante-Nicene fathers largely opposed the use of images in worship altogether, and more vehemently opposed veneration as a pagan practice.
"Nothing should be painted on the walls which is to be adorned by the people… we suffer not to worship at altars, images, or temples."
"It is not possible at the same time to know God and to address prayers to images."
"Works of art cannot then be sacred and divine."
"There is no religion wherever there is an image… because there can be nothing heavenly in that which is made on earth."
"Why do you not raise your eyes to heaven? Why do you look to walls and wood and stone, rather than to the place where you believe God to be?"
"Can it be that you have forgotten that passage in which God lays down the law that no likeness should be made either of what is in heaven or what is in the earth beneath? Have you ever heard anything of the kind [images] either yourself in church, or from another person? Are not such things banished and excluded from churches all over the world?"
"Have they mouth, and yet speak not? Have they eyes, and see not? Do we pray unto them, because through them we pray unto God? This is the chief cause of this insane profanity."
"and [the Carpocratian heretics'] make counterfit images of Christ"
"And they too are not less insane who think that images, fashioned by men of worthless and sometimes most wicked character, confer any honor upon genuine divinities."
"[Christians] not only avoid temples, altars and images, but are ready to suffer death when it is necessary."
"[The Carpocratian heretics] also possess images, some of them painted, and others formed from different kinds of material; while they maintain that a likeness of Christ was made by Pilate at that time when Jesus lived among them. They crown these images, and set them up along with the images of the philosophers of the world that is to say, with the images of Pythagoras, and Plato, and Aristotle, and the rest. They have also other modes of honouring these images, after the same manner of the Gentiles."
"[reacting negatively] They [pagans] presume to reply, that they worship not the bodies themselves, but the deities which preside over the government of them."
"It has come to our ears that your Fraternity, seeing certain adorers of images, broke and threw down these same images in Churches. And we commend you indeed for your zeal against anything made with hands being an object of adoration; but we signify to you that you ought not to have broken these images. For pictorial representation is made use of in Churches for this reason; that such as are ignorant of letters may at least read by looking at the walls what they cannot read in books. Your Fraternity therefore should have both preserved the images and prohibited the people from adoration of them."
The Immaculate Conception teaches that Mary was born without original sin and never committed a sin in her life. However, the sinlessness of Mary was not a widespread patristic teaching. Several fathers attributed moral failure, doubt, or a fallen nature to Mary.
"He alone is judge, because He alone is sinless. As far, however, as we can, let us try to sin as little as possible."
"For this Word of whom we speak alone is sinless. For to sin is natural and common to all."
"For God alone is without sin; and the only man without sin is Christ, since Christ is also God. . . . Just as no soul is without sin, so neither is any soul without seeds of good."
"For to the Son of God alone was it reserved to persevere to the last without sin."
"What ought we to think? That while the apostles were scandalized, the Mother of the Lord was immune from scandal? If she had experienced scandal during the Lord's Passion, Jesus did not die for her sins. But if all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, but are justified by his grace and redeemed, then Mary too was scandalized by this moment. This is what Simeon is prophesying about. . . . Your soul will be pierced by the sword of unbelief and will be wounded by the sword point of doubt."
"For in fact that which she had essayed to do, was of superfluous vanity; in that she wanted to show the people that she has power and authority over her Son, imagining not as yet anything great concerning Him; whence also her unseasonable approach."
"Simeon therefore prophesies about Mary herself, that when standing by the cross, and beholding what is being done, and hearing the voices, after the witness of Gabriel, after her secret knowledge of the divine conception, after the great exhibition of miracles, she shall feel about her soul a mighty tempest. The Lord was bound to taste of death for every man – to become a propitiation for the world and to justify all men by His own blood. Even thou thyself, who hast been taught from on high the things concerning the Lord, shalt be reached by some doubt. This is the sword. 'That the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.' He indicates that after the offence at the Cross of Christ a certain swift healing shall come from the Lord to the disciples and to Mary herself."
"Mary, descended from Adam, died because of sin."
"If this virgin, made capable of conceiving God, will encounter the severity of this judgment, who will dare to escape?"
"Accordingly, the body of Christ was truly assumed from the women's flesh, which is from her flesh of sin propagated from her conception. Nevertheless, because His body does not follow her conception in this same way, He is not her flesh of sin, but the likeness of the flesh of sin."
"One alone is there who was born without sin, in the likeness of sinful flesh, who lived without sin amid the sins of others, and who died without sin on account of our sins."
"But still continuing to be God, never had any sin, nor did he assume a flesh of sin, though born of a maternal flesh of sin. For what He then took of flesh, He either cleansed in order to take it, or cleansed by taking it."
The bodily assumption of Mary was infallibly dogmatized by Rome in 1950 and claimed to be an apostolic belief. However, this doctrine was so unknown for the first four hundred years of the church that it's almost difficult to find relevant quotes to this debate. The first suggestions of Mary's Assumption originated in Gnostic writings. The Church Fathers often expressed uncertainty about what happened to Mary at the end of her life, and their lists of those who've been assumed into heaven only ever included Enoch and Elijah.
"Either the holy Virgin died and was buried, then her falling asleep was with honor, her death chaste, her crown that of virginity. Or she was killed, as it is written: 'and your own soul a sword shall pierce,' then her glory is among the martyrs and her holy body amid blessings, she through whom light rose over the world. Or she remained alive, since nothing is impossible with God and He can do whatever He desires, for her end no one knows."
"Besides that, it is not only Elias, but Moses and Enoch you believe to be immortal, and to have been taken up with their bodies to heaven."
"Enoch was translated in the flesh; Elias was carried up to heaven in the flesh. They are not dead, they are inhabitants of Paradise."
"That Enoch and Elias, who even now, without experiencing a resurrection (because they have not even encountered death), are learning to the full what it is for the flesh to be exempted from all humiliation, and all loss, and all injury, and all disgrace — translated as they have been from this world."
"For Enoch, when he pleased God, was translated in the same body in which he did please Him, thus pointing out by anticipation the translation of the just. Elijah, too, was caught up [when he was yet] in the substance of the [natural] form; thus exhibiting in prophecy the assumption of those who are spiritual, and that nothing stood in the way of their body being translated and caught up."
"Now that, if it had pleased Him that all men should be immortal, it was in His power, He showed in the examples of Enoch and Elijah, while He did not suffer them to have any experience of death."
"Enoch no doubt was translated, and so was Elijah; nor did they experience death: it was postponed, (and only postponed,) most certainly."
"And Enoch also, having worn flesh, was translated, and not found. So also Elias was caught up with the flesh."
"Enoch and Elijah, who were translated so as to not see death."
"Remember that Enoch was translated; but Jesus ascended: remember what was said yesterday concerning Elias, that Elias was taken up in a chariot of fire; but that the chariots of Christ are ten thousand-fold even thousands upon thousands: and that Elias was taken up, towards the east of Jordan; but that Christ ascended at the east of the brook Cedron: and that Elias went as into heaven; but Jesus, into heaven."
"You may mention Elias the Tishbite who was taken up into heaven, yet he is not greater than John: Enoch was translated, but he is not greater than John."
"As when it is asked where Elijah is at the present moment, and where Enoch — whether in this Paradise or in some other place, although we doubt not of their existing still in the same bodies in which they were born."
"When he wrote that he should be caught up alive in the clouds to meet Christ? We read the same too of Enoch and of Elijah."
"And if any one should speak doubtfully concerning the soul of Elias, as that the Scriptures say that he was taken up in the flesh..., as was also proved by the translation of Enoch."
Rome teaches that one must confess mortal sin to a priest, or you lose your salvation. These mortal sins can be as common as missing Mass on Sunday. Frequent confession is expected to remain in a state of grace. However, this is not consistent with the Patristic practice of confession. Early Christians would confess openly to the congregation for their own spiritual well-being. For offenses that harmed the entire church, such as murder and adultery, these sins led to excommunication. For these sins, it was standard practice for bishops in the 3rd century to only offer one penance (or a one-time re-admittance to the Church) for an entire lifetime.
"the sphere of action of this second and only (remaining) repentance."
"For the graver crimes, there is only one opportunity of penance."
"If anyone is tempted by the devil, and sins after that great and holy calling [baptism]... he has opportunity to repent but once."
"As there is one baptism, so there is one penance, which, however, is performed publicly."
"I do not say that you should make your sins known in public, nor that you should accuse yourself before others, but I would have you obey the prophet who says, 'Make known your ways before God'. Therefore, confess your sins before God, the true Judge, with prayer. Tell your errors, not with the tongue, but with the memory of your conscience, and so forth."